<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Thoughts on YHOO/MSFT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/818/more-thoughts-on-yhoomsft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/818/more-thoughts-on-yhoomsft/</link>
	<description>The new thing</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey McManus</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/818/more-thoughts-on-yhoomsft/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey McManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/?p=818#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>Simple, because Microsoft sells a competing product.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple, because Microsoft sells a competing product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheeri Cabral</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/818/more-thoughts-on-yhoomsft/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheeri Cabral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/?p=818#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>I think if Microsoft wanted to branch MySQL (like they practically did with SQL Server from Sybase), it would be awesome for MySQL.

I doubt that MySQL would lose here; why do you think so?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if Microsoft wanted to branch MySQL (like they practically did with SQL Server from Sybase), it would be awesome for MySQL.</p>
<p>I doubt that MySQL would lose here; why do you think so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey McManus</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/818/more-thoughts-on-yhoomsft/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey McManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/?p=818#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>I'm sure they have Oracle somewhere but Yahoo is one of the biggest users of MySQL there is.

&lt;a href="http://www.mysql.com/customers/customer.php?id=3" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mysql.com/customers/customer.php?id=3&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure they have Oracle somewhere but Yahoo is one of the biggest users of MySQL there is.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mysql.com/customers/customer.php?id=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysql.com/customers/customer.php?id=3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/818/more-thoughts-on-yhoomsft/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jeffreymcmanus.com/?p=818#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>"Big losers here from a tech supplier perspective: FreeBSD and MySQL."

From what I know Yahoo has always been an Oracle shop. The one exception I'm aware of is finance.yahoo.com because Jeremy Zawodny was a big fan of MySQL and used it even though they had an Oracle site license.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Big losers here from a tech supplier perspective: FreeBSD and MySQL.&#8221;</p>
<p>From what I know Yahoo has always been an Oracle shop. The one exception I&#8217;m aware of is finance.yahoo.com because Jeremy Zawodny was a big fan of MySQL and used it even though they had an Oracle site license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
